Jesus Encounters the Blind
Sermon for the Fourth Sunday in Lent
We all love a good Bible story. Today we have heard two stories that may be familiar to you: the story of Samuel anointing David as king, and the story of Jesus giving sight to the man who was blind from birth.
But as we read these narratives, I believe it’s easy for us to hear a version of these stories that’s not really there, and to miss a lot of what’s truly going on. Are we hearing the story that Scripture is telling?
Recently on a podcast I heard, the guest spoke of stories as the best way to change an organization’s culture. People think and act differently depending on what story they think they are a part of, what role they think they are playing.
This is also true for the people of God. One reason the Bible is full of stories is that we always need to be confronting the stories that we tell about ourselves, our prevailing cultural myths, with the quite different story that God tells in Holy Scripture.
But if we’re not careful, it’s easy to mis-read biblical stories through the lens of the world’s narratives, allowing us to believe that the Bible stories reinforce our own prejudices instead of confronting them.
So I’d like to look at these two stories of Samuel anointing David, and Jesus giving sight to the blind man, with this question in mind: what are the standard narratives of our time that we might associate with these stories, and what might really going on?
It’s easy to read this story of the young David, for instance, in a way that reinforces one of our own present-day myths: the myth of human potential. According to this myth, we can find fulfillment in life, as well as help other people find fulfillment in life, through the recognition and “actualization” of our individual, innate qualities and capacities, thus becoming the “best version of ourselves.” This myth can also be stated in the negative, as of someone who has disappointed our expectations: “He’s failing to live up to his potential.”
By myth, I don’t mean this story is entirely untrue; just that it is one of the many stories that shape how we see ourselves and the world. There are many other such myths. The myth of fundamental human equality, for instance, and the myth of human potential don’t necessarily agree with one another, though somehow we manage to believe in both of them.
Viewed through the lens of “human potential”, the story of David looks like this: God recognizes that, among all the tribes and families of Israel, this youngest son from an obscure village has what it takes to lead and become Israel’s next king. In this way of telling the story, God works through the prophet Samuel to overcome fear, prejudice, and patriarchal conditioning to single out and prepare this promising youngster for kingship.
Some of the supporting details appear to fit this framework. David is the youngest son, overlooked by his father and brothers, but God looks deeper and sees what they do not. And as the story continues, extraordinary qualities will be revealed in this young man, whose public career as a leader in Israel will begin when he kills the Philistine champion Goliath in single combat and rallies the demoralized Israelites to rout their stronger enemy.
But in terms of the biblical narrative, that pivotal moment in David’s story, and all that follows, is the consequence of what happened on this day, when Jesse’s youngest son, belatedly summoned to the feast, was anointed in secret by the prophet Samuel and received the Spirit of God.
This is not a story of human potential being actualized. This is a story principally of God, choosing and empowering his servant to lead his people.
Ultimately, David is not chosen for his own sake, but for the sake of one who would come, his distant offspring, born in Bethlehem, who was called the Son of David.
God does not choose David because of David’s superior qualities or potential greatness, or even because of his humility. It would be more true to say that the qualities that are revealed in David are the result of God’s call, and the work of the Holy Spirit that, the Scripture says, “came mightily upon David from that day forward.”
Just so, as Christians we are not chosen for the sake of who we are; rather, we are chosen in Christ, for the sake of who he is and what he has done.
What might happen to us, if we began to see ourselves in light of this biblical narrative? All of us who have been baptized into the new life of Jesus Christ have been called by God, and have received the same Spirit that David received, to empower us as a kingly and priestly people advancing his kingdom in our world. We don’t have to set our natural giftings and interests aside—they, too, are from God—but we should be open as well to the supernatural empowerment that comes not from our own individuality but from the Spirit of God that now dwells within our hearts. Which means that people who, objectively speaking, are ordinary, average, flawed—statistically speaking, that’s all of us—are the people through whom God is likely to do his perfect and holy works, not the talented, great, or powerful people of this world.
Let’s briefly now turn to this story of the man born blind. There are many stories of supernatural healing in the scriptures, and Jesus himself heals many. So it would be easy to read this story as another one. But if we look closely, this is not a story of Jesus fixing what’s broken, like medicine only better. There are other stories of Jesus healing the blind. But this man had not lost his sight. He never had it. But what Jesus does here is an act of new creation. He forms in this man’s body a capacity of sight that he has never had before.
An important clue to the real meaning of this story is the way Jesus does it. The material cause, so to speak, of this man’s healing is dust, spit, and water. The dust recalls God’s creation of the first man from the dust of the earth. The spit from Jesus’s mouth evokes his creating word which brings into existence that which formerly had no existence save in the eternal wisdom and foreknowledge of God. And the washing is obviously a symbol of baptism, the new creation in the Spirit.
This man returns from the pool of Siloam not just able to see, but spiritually regenerated, a totally new man. In his subsequent interviews with the enemies of Jesus, the man exhibits all of the gifts of the Holy Spirit that are bestowed in Confirmation: wisdom, understanding, good counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and the fear of the Lord. He did not have any of these things before.
There are many other stories of sick people reaching out in faith to Jesus and being healed. This is not one of them. This man was inert. He did not ask to be healed. Nothing suggests that he recognized who Jesus was or what he could do. The man does not speak, or do anything at all, until Jesus sends him to the pool called “Sent.” He returns transformed, both physically and spiritually.
This week, an important system failed in our minivan, and I needed the help of an expert auto mechanic to fix it. That is not a good analogy for what Jesus wants to do in our lives. We limit the work of God in our lives when we treat Jesus as one who can help us solve important but ultimately limited problems that we have.
This narrative of Jesus as fixer sounds pious but is just as misleading as the myth of human potential. It underestimates the gravity of our human condition and the extent of the salvation that we need and which Jesus offers. He will help us when we get sick or stuck, but he won’t stop there. He wants to remake us into people who increasingly resemble himself—as he did with David; as he did with the man who used to be blind.
This is good news for us, and good news for the world. But it comes with danger. If Jesus’s work in our lives is limited to specific problems and their solutions, the danger of neglecting or misunderstanding him is also limited. Whereas, to neglect a salvation that involves the total regeneration of our personhood is perilous indeed. And we find from these biblical stories that it is quite possible for us to refuse God’s call, to refuse to recognize the truth of the story of God that we are in, and become spiritually blind and unresponsive to Christ.
So it was with the enemies of Jesus in this story. You see how they worry the poor man and his family with their repeated interrogations. They are not looking for information. They do not want to understand. The miracle was done in full view. What they are looking for is a way to justify their own stories about themselves in which they are the elect, the heroes of the story, the people at the center of God’s purposes in the world. They are the knowers among the ignorant; the teachers among the simple; the righteous among sinners. All of these stories are contradicted by the words and works of this man Jesus who confronts them as blind and corrupt, and openly announces himself as the one and only Son of God through whom all the hopes of Israel shall be accomplished.
Jesus calls their blindness a judgment. “For judgment I came into this world,” he says, “that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may become blind.”


